Professional skeptic and media rabblerouser, Bill Maher, willfully engaged the taboo this week when he expressed his doubts about the Swine Flu vaccine. Not surprisingly, his panelists reacted as if he suggested they eat a small child, live on set.

This is an especially courageous stance for Maher to take given the greater medical community’s open disdain for anyone who would question their products. Never mind that there is a body of evidence mounting that most currently cited vaccine efficacy studies are heavily biased and, no double-blind vaccine testing (against a placebo group) have ever been effectively demonstrated.

Never mind that in both 1968 and 1977, when flu vaccines were completely mismatched to corresponding seasonal outbreaks, the flu mortality rate didn’t rise a single point. Never mind that even though we immunize 50% more elderly people than we did 20 years ago, the death rate has increased nearly twofold.

Never mind that (as Maher cites) a typical flu vaccine contains mercury, chicken embryos and formaldehyde. Nope, there certainly isn’t a credible debate to be had on whether we should be injecting millions of people with that. Certainly not. Right Canadians?

Even the usually infallible Jon Stewart completely dropped the ball on this debate. Instead, he used shlubby Glen Beck as a strawman to avoid the real arguments completely.

The moral of the story is, never believe the glowing screen — especially when it tells you that you’d be a fool to question it. Do your own research and find your own answers. Either that, or willfully accept your intravenous chicken fetus.

One Response to “Daring to Doubt Vaccine Efficacy”

1. PHYLLIS says:

   October 19, 2009 at 7:42 PM

   I am IMMMMPRESSED. That is the most sensible scenario I have heard Bill Maher utter. He is correct in every statement he made about our health, and health providers and jello. I love it. Just what our government does not want, questioning any facts issued by them. Thanks, Bill and thanks Russell for that tidbit.